杰斐逊和汉密尔顿啧啧啧

The situation in St. Domingue put the Democratic-Republican party and its leader, Thomas Jefferson, in somewhat of a political dilemma. Jefferson believed strongly in the French Revolution and the ideals it promoted, but as a Virginia slaveholder popular among other Virginia slaveholders, Jefferson also feared the specter of slave revolt. When faced with the question of what the United States should do about the French colony of St. Domingue, Jefferson favored offering limited aid to suppress the revolt, but also suggested that the slaveowners should aim for a compromise similar to that Jamaican slaveholders made with communities of escaped slaves in 1739. Despite their numerous differences on other issues, Secretary of the Treasury and leader of the rival Federalist Party Alexander Hamilton largely agreed with Jefferson regarding Haiti policy.

这篇论文读得好舒服,看作者拿着榔头一个接一个地敲碎柏林捏的洗脑包……

向首页所有人推荐Robert E. Norton 的The Myth of the Counter-Enlightenment这篇论文,复制地址进sci-hub就能下载,手把手分析拆解了学艺不精的肤浅文人kol如何用断章取义来发洗脑包,读来很有收获,也能用于反思自己当成“常识”的东西会不会也是未经破解的洗脑包

jstor.org/stable/30136085

而且这么一想的话我其实也缺少靠谱的启蒙运动全局观,进步史观自吹自擂的不可信,反动史观一竿子打死启蒙的更不行。《什么是启蒙?》仍然是个很难回答但也很有意义的问题

actually I have no idea what exactly happened in 18th century

獠,在右江溪洞之外,俗謂之山獠。依山林而居,無酋長、版籍,蠻之荒忽無常者也。以射生食動而活,蟲豸能蠕動者皆取食,無年甲姓名。一村中惟有事力者曰郎火,餘但稱火。舊傳其類有飛頭、鑿齒、鼻飲、白衫、花面、赤揮之屬二十一種。今在江西南一帶甚多,殆百餘種也。

【宋】范成大

发现Brill有一本讲1801~1813年俄伊战争的书

看起来好像是在理性主义东方主义面前为东方辩护,仔细一想,这不是变相在说东方人天生傻逼你不要苛责吗,不还是看不起人。无论怎么读都只能感到是一种purple prose民科。康德比你有名是有原因的,因为康德确实更深刻

区别大概就在于,一边是举了很多东方人傻逼的例子(真实性要打个问号,但也不全然是假新闻,有的确实傻逼),然后哈哈大笑东方傻逼,俺们西方最理性最高级最懂哲学。另一边就是急了,我们西方哪有你吹的那么好,东方就算傻逼但东方也不是故意这样的,是有很多环境和习惯的原因……然而还是共用了同一个东方傻逼的前提。

@scalanaturae 大家都挺傻逼的,人的傻逼不以任何条件做分界

Follow

@RedDahlia 傻逼也有傻逼的基本法,你看康德和马克思解释一个东西为什么傻逼的时候都会清清楚楚1234列出来分析……赫尔德屌都没有,张口就来,煽情洒水,完全缺乏实质内容

@scalanaturae 差到了丈育如我都感觉他在鬼扯的程度(。)

@RedDahlia 你没有丈育,是他有问题💢💢💢💢💢

Sign in to participate in the conversation
ni.hil.ist

ni.hil.ist is a server run by individuals who are friendly to a nihilistic worldview.